Page 3 of 4
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2003 9:18 pm
by scottidog
If "John" refers to Bermuda, it's spelled Jon. I can't stress that enough.
So in conclusion: JON. JON. JON. Ixnay on the "H." :biggrin:
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2003 11:58 pm
by Sploich
Deleted.
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:43 am
by scottidog
I think that was "John" answering the question regarding the time.
:biggrin:
play
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2003 4:16 am
by Lightning7smith
Scotti,answering your question,John was the first name that came to my mind,it just so happened to be the same name as Jon's(but with a h),and Sploich yes he was answering a time question.
play
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2003 4:19 am
by Lightning7smith
COULD SOMEONE TELL ME WHAT THEY THINK!!!
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2003 5:33 am
by Kevbo1987
I think it's getting much better. The extra talking is good, and adds a lot to the play. Are you planning on adding more to it? If you do, I think you could really have something going for you. I know I would pay to go see this. If I have one constructive criticism, it's that some of the scenes(mainly the bus and the waffle one) seem a little detached from the rest of the scenes. There needs to be a little more of a connection. Other than that, you've got yourself a hit!
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2003 5:41 am
by Clyde the Viking
QUOTE There is no John 7:27
From the Bible, King James Version:
QUOTE
John 7:27
Howbeit we know this man whence he is: but when Christ cometh, no man knoweth whence he is.
Having a Bible nearby paying off! :biggrin:
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2003 6:03 am
by scottidog
One thing that I think needs work, is that Al seems to have the lesser part. Most of his answers are one word. Almost as if he was the straight man.
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2003 6:09 am
by TMBJon
There's no antagonist in this story at all?
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2003 6:32 am
by The Sporkman
QUOTE There's no antagonist in this story at all?
Well, if you want to be literarily analytical about this, I would guess that the antagonist is Al's ensuing obsession-induced insanity.