Polkarama!

mikelgb · Post by **mikelgb** » Thu Sep 14, 2006 4:10 pm

johnfan27 @ Sep 13 2006, 09:01 PM wrote: I guess i'm still a bit out of current popular culture, cuz I've never heard of Gold Digger. And concerning Don't Cha and Candyshop, I just don't like songs with bad or suggestive themes.

i hope I'm not being forward, but do you mind if I chew on your butt?

johnfan27 · Post by **johnfan27** » Fri Sep 15, 2006 1:39 am

Yeah, not a big fan of WBUL for the same reason.

sarley27 · Post by **sarley27** » Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:28 am

MaleHeffer @ Sep 14 2006, 05:39 AM wrote: well, i don't think anyone will take this too seriously from AL. while they themes are very suggestive, they were popular songs, and they will sell him some ALbums, but i don't think he will grab a PA label.

wouldn't that be funny!

considering many of the young Al fans I know and/or knew's music diet consisted of strictly Radio Disney and/or contemporary Christian music, Al putting out a Parental Advisory label album would be a huge mistake.

I'd still buy the thing anyway though.

Post by **The Lilac Pilgrim** » Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:28 pm

Wow, I didn't know PA tags and suggestive themes were such harsh problems for some people out there.

To each their own and all that, but in this world, you people against the above would need to climb into a box so you didn't see any of that in the real world

I'm not attacking anyone, just saying.

(Plus, I personally love WBUL - it's just so funny...)

Pete Man · Post by **Pete Man** » Sat Sep 16, 2006 6:27 am

Allright, I ahvent really read that much and I dont know what WBUL is but, as far as Parental Advisorys go, you can stick one on an album that doesnt even have words, and NOT stick one on an album that only has swear words, basically its up to the label. I think that Parental Advisorysd are starting to lose effect anyway, but maybe its because I dont care either.

Pete Man · Post by **Pete Man** » Sat Sep 16, 2006 6:32 am

The Lilac Pilgrim @ Sep 15 2006, 07:28 PM wrote: To each their own and all that, but in this world, you people against the above would need to climb into a box so you didn't see any of that in the real world

sorry about the double post.

I agree to an extent but the thing is, it isnt the people that want the album that wont buy it, but some paretns wont let their kids get a cd with the sticker. Plus, some parents actually make the right decisons because kids are friggen idiots and copy that stuff.

Weird Alan · Post by **Weird Alan** » Sat Sep 16, 2006 10:42 am

Wait, Al getting a PA label?

Ha. He could say the F word and not get a PA label.

Gooseboy · Post by **Gooseboy** » Sat Sep 16, 2006 12:14 pm

suggestive lyrics???

are you kids retarded?

does no one remember the lyrics to past polkas?

in "hooked on polkas" frankie goes to hollywood's "relax" was about ejaculation

in "polka your eyes out" divinyls' "i touch myself" was about masturbation

do i have to go on?

that's what's so great about putting these songs in a polka send up. it exposes the songs for cheap salacious drivel that they are. that's the joke!!

Post by **Kevbo1987** » Sat Sep 16, 2006 4:54 pm

Weird Alan @ Sep 16 2006, 04:42 AM wrote: Wait, Al getting a PA label?

Ha. He could say the F word and not get a PA label.

No way. Suggestive themes, of which there really aren't any on this album (at least that I know of), are not going to grab a Parental Advisory. Al would have to really let loose on the curse words to get something like that. There was originally speculation that he might put a parody of a PA sticker on the cover, but everyone agreed that it would confuse people.

Post by **weirdojace** » Sat Sep 16, 2006 8:22 pm

To get a PA label you have to say the F and S words a bunch of times. Suggestive themes, or even words like "ass" won't get you a label. And I'm pretty sure you can get away with saying the F bomb or the S word like once or twice and not get a label.